Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1499

reference
896-tree-1
name
1499
tree-preservation-order

undefined

896-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.970575 50.866291)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.970504 50.866284,-0.970507 50.866298,-0.970517 50.866310,-0.970533 50.866320,-0.970552 50.866327,-0.970574 50.866329,-0.970596 50.866327,-0.970616 50.866321,-0.970632 50.866311,-0.970642 50.866299,-0.970646 50.866285,-0.970643 50.866271,-0.970633 50.866258,-0.970618 50.866248,-0.970598 50.866242,-0.970576 50.866239,-0.970554 50.866241,-0.970534 50.866248,-0.970518 50.866257,-0.970508 50.866270,-0.970504 50.866284)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL